Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Climate: Other & Water Use : Livestock or Mining/Extraction support

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (10) - Ecosystems (9) - Governance (13) - Values and Norms (9) - Water Quality (9) - Water Quantity (8)

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (3) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (14) - conservation lands (7) - forest land (6) - industrial use (7) - mining operations (6) - rangeland (4) - religious/cultural sites (5) - urban (5) - urban- high density (5)

Water Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Agriculture or Irrigation - Domestic/Urban Supply - Fisheries - farmed - Fisheries - wild - Hydropower Generation - Industry - consumptive use - Industry - non-consumptive use - Livestock - Mining/Extraction support - Other Ecological Services - Recreation or Tourism - Other - None

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (11) - Cultural Interest (4) - Development/humanitarian interest (6) - Environmental interest (10) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (8) - Industry/Corporate Interest (12) - Local Government (7) - Non-legislative governmental agency (9) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (14) - Supranational union (4)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (1) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (3) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (3) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (3) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (3) - What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (2) - What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights? (1) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (5)

Showing below up to 18 results in range #1 to #18.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)