Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables : Values and Norms or Water Quantity & Climate: Moist

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Assets - Ecosystems - Governance - Values and Norms - Water Quality - Water Quantity - Other - None

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (1) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (8) - conservation lands (1) - forest land (5) - industrial use (5) - mining operations (1) - rangeland (2) - religious/cultural sites (2) - urban (2) - urban- high density (4)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (7) - Domestic/Urban Supply (5) - Fisheries - farmed (1) - Fisheries - wild (1) - Hydropower Generation (7) - Industry - consumptive use (1) - Industry - non-consumptive use (1) - Livestock (2) - Mining/Extraction support (1) - Other Ecological Services (1) - Recreation or Tourism (1)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (5) - Cultural Interest (1) - Development/humanitarian interest (1) - Environmental interest (4) - Industry/Corporate Interest (4) - Local Government (4) - Non-legislative governmental agency (7) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (7) - Supranational union (1)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (2) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (1) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (2) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (4) - What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (4) - Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (1)

Showing below up to 8 results in range #1 to #8.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)