Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables: Governance & Climate: Dry-winter & Land Use: rangeland

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Assets - Ecosystems - Governance - Values and Norms - Water Quality - Water Quantity - Other - None

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- agricultural- confined livestock operations - agricultural- cropland and pasture - conservation lands - forest land - industrial use - mining operations - rangeland - religious/cultural sites - urban - urban- high density - Other - None

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (4) - Domestic/Urban Supply (4) - Fisheries - wild (1) - Hydropower Generation (2) - Industry - consumptive use (1) - Livestock (1) - Other Ecological Services (1) - Recreation or Tourism (3)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (2) - Cultural Interest (1) - Development/humanitarian interest (1) - Environmental interest (3) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (1) - Industry/Corporate Interest (2) - Local Government (1) - Non-legislative governmental agency (3) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (4) - Supranational union (1)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (1) - How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (4)

Showing below up to 5 results in range #1 to #5.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)