Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Climate: Dry-winter & Land Use : forest land or industrial use

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (1) - Governance (5) - Values and Norms (3) - Water Quality (4) - Water Quantity (5)

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- agricultural- confined livestock operations - agricultural- cropland and pasture - conservation lands - forest land - industrial use - mining operations - rangeland - religious/cultural sites - urban - urban- high density - Other - None

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (7) - Domestic/Urban Supply (6) - Fisheries - farmed (1) - Fisheries - wild (2) - Hydropower Generation (7) - Industry - consumptive use (2) - Industry - non-consumptive use (1) - Livestock (3) - Mining/Extraction support (1) - Other Ecological Services (1) - Recreation or Tourism (3)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (4) - Cultural Interest (2) - Development/humanitarian interest (1) - Environmental interest (1) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (3) - Industry/Corporate Interest (2) - Local Government (2) - Non-legislative governmental agency (4) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (5) - Supranational union (1)

Key Question:

- How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (1) - How can packages or options that link issues creatively or build on possible technology innovations be employed to create non-zero sum choices within negotiations that include water resources? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (1) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (3) - What approaches are most beneficial for rapidly growing cities in the developing world to link water management to sustainable urban growth strategy? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (1) - What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights? (1) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (4)

Showing below up to 8 results in range #1 to #8.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)