Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables: Ecosystems & Climate : Moist or alpine

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Assets - Ecosystems - Governance - Values and Norms - Water Quality - Water Quantity - Other - None

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (1) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (5) - conservation lands (2) - forest land (3) - industrial use (4) - mining operations (2) - rangeland (1) - urban (1) - urban- high density (1)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (7) - Domestic/Urban Supply (5) - Fisheries - farmed (1) - Fisheries - wild (2) - Hydropower Generation (5) - Industry - consumptive use (1) - Industry - non-consumptive use (2) - Livestock (1) - Mining/Extraction support (1) - Other Ecological Services (2)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (4) - Cultural Interest (1) - Development/humanitarian interest (2) - Environmental interest (5) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (1) - Industry/Corporate Interest (5) - Local Government (2) - Non-legislative governmental agency (6) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (6) - Supranational union (1)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (3) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (1) - How can packages or options that link issues creatively or build on possible technology innovations be employed to create non-zero sum choices within negotiations that include water resources? (1) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (1) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (2) - What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (2) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (2) - What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? (1) - Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (2)

Showing below up to 7 results in range #1 to #7.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)