Browse by Attribute
Choose a category:
- ASI (43)
- Article (772)
- Case Study (75)
- Key Question (28)
Case Study > Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables :
Governance or
Values and Norms
& Climate :
Moist or
Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type)
& Water Use :
Fisheries - farmed or
Other
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
- Community or organized citizens (19)
- Cultural Interest (6)
- Development/humanitarian interest (7)
- Environmental interest (16)
- Federated state/territorial/provincial government (9)
- Industry/Corporate Interest (14)
- Local Government (15)
- Non-legislative governmental agency (18)
- Sovereign state/national/federal government (23)
- Supranational union (3)
- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (5)
- How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1)
- How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (2)
- How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1)
- How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (1)
- How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (3)
- How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (5)
- To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (7)
- What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (2)
- What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights? (1)
- What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (2)
- What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (12)
- What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? (1)
- Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (2)
Showing below up to 27 results in range #1 to #27.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
- Addressing Declining Groundwater Supply in Umatilla County, Oregon, USA
- Addressing the Transboundary Water Conflict Between the Blue Nile Riparian States
C
- Case Study of Transboundary Dispute Resolution: Multilateral Working Group on Water Resources (Middle East)
- Case Study of Transboundary Dispute Resolution: the Tigris-Euphrates Basin
- Conflict Management Strategies Among Riparians Within the Indus River Basin
E
- Efforts of Coordinating Joint Development of Hydropower Projects Within the Salween Basin
- Efforts to Resolve the Aral Sea Crisis
F
I
I cont.
- Integrated Joint Management Agreements of Mekong River Basin Riparians
- Integration of a Basin-Wide Framework for Protecting Danube Water Quality
- Inter-province Water Sharing in Pakistan's Indus: Climate Change, Surface Water, and Uncertainty
- International Joint Development of The La Plata River Basin
- International Management for Water Quality Within The Kura-Araks Basin
L
M
N
O
O cont.
P
R
T
- The Pecos River Compact and Texas - New Mexico Dispute
- The Republican River Compact
- Transboundary Dispute Resolution: U.S./Mexico Shared Aquifers
U
W