Browse by Attribute
Choose a category:
- ASI (43)
- Article (772)
- Case Study (75)
- Key Question (28)
Case Study > Climate
:
Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type)
or
Moist
or
Moist tropical (Köppen A-type)
or
alpine
& Water Use
:
Domestic/Urban Supply
or
Livestock
or
Other Ecological Services
& Stakeholder Type:
Sovereign state/national/federal government ![](/wiki/extensions/SemanticDrilldown/skins/filter-x.png)
![](/wiki/extensions/SemanticDrilldown/skins/filter-x.png)
![](/wiki/extensions/SemanticDrilldown/skins/filter-x.png)
![](/wiki/extensions/SemanticDrilldown/skins/filter-x.png)
![](/wiki/extensions/SemanticDrilldown/skins/filter-x.png)
![](/wiki/extensions/SemanticDrilldown/skins/filter-x.png)
![](/wiki/extensions/SemanticDrilldown/skins/filter-x.png)
![](/wiki/extensions/SemanticDrilldown/skins/filter-x.png)
![](/wiki/extensions/SemanticDrilldown/skins/filter-x.png)
![](/wiki/extensions/SemanticDrilldown/skins/filter-x.png)
![](/wiki/extensions/SemanticDrilldown/skins/filter-x.png)
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (3)
- How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (2)
- How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (2)
- How can packages or options that link issues creatively or build on possible technology innovations be employed to create non-zero sum choices within negotiations that include water resources? (1)
- How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (5)
- How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (3)
- To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (5)
- What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (2)
- What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (2)
- What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights? (1)
- What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (4)
- What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (9)
- What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? (2)
- Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (1)
Showing below up to 20 results in range #1 to #20.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
2
B
C
- Case Study of Transboundary Dispute Resolution: the Tigris-Euphrates Basin
- Conflict Management Strategies Among Riparians Within the Indus River Basin
D
E
I
I cont.
- International Joint Development of The La Plata River Basin
- International Management for Water Quality Within The Kura-Araks Basin
M
- Management, Protection, and Control of Lake Titicaca
- Multi-State Approaches to Environmental Restoration in the Chesapeake Bay and Water Diplomacy Framework Opportunities
N
O
P
T
- The Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery and San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Programs
- Transboundary Dispute Resolution: U.S./Mexico Shared Aquifers
U
W