Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables: Water Quantity & Climate : Dry-winter or alpine

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Assets - Ecosystems - Governance - Values and Norms - Water Quality - Water Quantity - Other - None

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (1) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (9) - conservation lands (3) - forest land (4) - industrial use (4) - rangeland (4) - religious/cultural sites (3) - urban (3) - urban- high density (3)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (9) - Domestic/Urban Supply (7) - Fisheries - wild (1) - Hydropower Generation (8) - Industry - consumptive use (1) - Industry - non-consumptive use (1) - Livestock (3) - Other Ecological Services (1) - Recreation or Tourism (3)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (5) - Cultural Interest (3) - Development/humanitarian interest (2) - Environmental interest (3) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (5) - Industry/Corporate Interest (3) - Local Government (5) - Non-legislative governmental agency (7) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (7) - Supranational union (3)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (2) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (2) - How can packages or options that link issues creatively or build on possible technology innovations be employed to create non-zero sum choices within negotiations that include water resources? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (1) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (3) - What approaches are most beneficial for rapidly growing cities in the developing world to link water management to sustainable urban growth strategy? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (2) - What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights? (1) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (5)

Showing below up to 10 results in range #1 to #10.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)