Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Climate : Dry-winter or Moist & Land Use: urban

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (3) - Ecosystems (1) - Governance (5) - Values and Norms (1) - Water Quality (4) - Water Quantity (5)

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- agricultural- confined livestock operations - agricultural- cropland and pasture - conservation lands - forest land - industrial use - mining operations - rangeland - religious/cultural sites - urban - urban- high density - Other - None

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (7) - Domestic/Urban Supply (4) - Fisheries - farmed (2) - Fisheries - wild (2) - Hydropower Generation (5) - Industry - consumptive use (2) - Industry - non-consumptive use (1) - Livestock (3) - Mining/Extraction support (1) - Other Ecological Services (2) - Recreation or Tourism (2)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (3) - Cultural Interest (1) - Environmental interest (4) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (1) - Industry/Corporate Interest (3) - Local Government (1) - Non-legislative governmental agency (3) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (6) - Supranational union (2)

Key Question:

- How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (1) - How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (1) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (1) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (2) - What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (1) - What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights? (1) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (4)

Showing below up to 7 results in range #1 to #7.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)