Browse by Attribute
Choose a category:
- ASI (43)
- Article (772)
- Case Study (75)
- Key Question (28)
Case Study > Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:
Assets
& Climate :
Continental (Köppen D-type) or
cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar)
& Stakeholder Type :
Development/humanitarian interest or
Local Government or
Sovereign state/national/federal government
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
- Agriculture or Irrigation (7)
- Domestic/Urban Supply (7)
- Fisheries - farmed (2)
- Fisheries - wild (3)
- Hydropower Generation (6)
- Industry - consumptive use (2)
- Industry - non-consumptive use (3)
- Livestock (2)
- Mining/Extraction support (1)
- Other Ecological Services (5)
- Recreation or Tourism (2)
- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (1)
- How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (3)
- How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1)
- How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (1)
- To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (4)
- What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (1)
- What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (4)
- What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (2)
- What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (3)
Showing below up to 10 results in range #1 to #10.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
C
E
F
M
M cont.
N
P
U
W