Talk:Efforts to Resolve the Aral Sea Crisis
This page is only for discussing the contents of the parent case or article: Efforts to Resolve the Aral Sea Crisis
Each article in AquaPedia has its own discussion page, which is for comments, questions, and discourse on the topics and content of the linked article. Please only post your comments where they are most relevant.
Only users who are logged in may comment. If you are not logged in, use the "Log In" link in the top right corner.
Click the "Start a new discussion" link below to begin a new discussion thread. You may also reply to any (existing) comments or topics. If you have trouble using the discussion extension, you can find information on how to use it here (external link).
- [View source↑]
- [History↑]
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| Case needs updating - actions, situations, arrangements between 2004 - 2012 are not addressed in the case (as of 14 November 2012) | 0 | 14:45, 3 January 2013 |
Case needs updating - actions, situations, arrangements between 2004 - 2012 are not addressed in the case (as of 14 November 2012)
A number of changes have occurred. The Aral Sea Crisis is still a grave environmental concern, but some of the institutional arrangements mentioned in this case study have changed over the past 8 years, and there have been some actions toward trying to resolve the crisis. This case study needs to incorporate these details.
A news item that touches on some of these updates:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/kazakhstan/9012718/Will-the-Aral-Sea-ever-return.html
I would like to invite anyone with knowledge or interest in this case to update the information related to it to reflect more recent developments.
Additionally, much of the text in this article is taken word-for-word from the TFDD, which is cited for the entire article, but not for the quoted sections. This was done with permission, but it would be healthier to paraphrase and cite quotes/paraphrases by sentence/paragraph if needed.
