Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Key Question : How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? or What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights?

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (9) - Ecosystems (7) - Governance (10) - Values and Norms (5) - Water Quality (8) - Water Quantity (11)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (5) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (2) - Dry-summer (2) - Dry-winter (2) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (4) - Moist (2) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (2) - Monsoon (1) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (6) - temperate (1)

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (1) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (8) - forest land (3) - industrial use (7) - mining operations (1) - rangeland (3) - religious/cultural sites (4) - urban (5) - urban- high density (4)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (12) - Domestic/Urban Supply (9) - Fisheries - farmed (1) - Fisheries - wild (1) - Hydropower Generation (8) - Industry - consumptive use (1) - Livestock (3) - Mining/Extraction support (2) - Other Ecological Services (5)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (5) - Cultural Interest (1) - Development/humanitarian interest (4) - Environmental interest (7) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (6) - Industry/Corporate Interest (7) - Local Government (5) - Non-legislative governmental agency (7) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (13)

Key Question: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Other - None

Showing below up to 13 results in range #1 to #13.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)