Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Key Question : How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? or Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project?

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (8) - Ecosystems (9) - Governance (10) - Values and Norms (2) - Water Quality (6) - Water Quantity (8)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (2) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (3) - Dry-summer (3) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (3) - Moist (3) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (3) - Monsoon (3) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (2) - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (1) - temperate (1)

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (1) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (7) - forest land (3) - industrial use (5) - rangeland (2) - urban (3) - urban- high density (1)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (8) - Domestic/Urban Supply (5) - Fisheries - farmed (3) - Fisheries - wild (5) - Hydropower Generation (7) - Industry - consumptive use (2) - Industry - non-consumptive use (1) - Livestock (3) - Mining/Extraction support (1) - Other Ecological Services (2)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (8) - Cultural Interest (2) - Development/humanitarian interest (3) - Environmental interest (6) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (5) - Industry/Corporate Interest (6) - Local Government (6) - Non-legislative governmental agency (4) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (10) - Supranational union (1)

Key Question: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Other - None

Showing below up to 11 results in range #1 to #11.

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)