Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Key Question : What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? or Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project?

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (15) - Ecosystems (10) - Governance (21) - Values and Norms (7) - Water Quality (14) - Water Quantity (17)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (10) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (8) - Dry-summer (5) - Dry-winter (6) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (4) - Moist (6) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (7) - Monsoon (6) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (9) - alpine (3) - temperate (3)

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (1) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (20) - conservation lands (5) - forest land (8) - industrial use (10) - mining operations (1) - rangeland (9) - religious/cultural sites (7) - urban (8) - urban- high density (4)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (20) - Domestic/Urban Supply (17) - Fisheries - farmed (1) - Fisheries - wild (4) - Hydropower Generation (16) - Industry - consumptive use (3) - Other Ecological Services (5) - Recreation or Tourism (4)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (13) - Cultural Interest (3) - Development/humanitarian interest (5) - Environmental interest (12) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (9) - Industry/Corporate Interest (8) - Local Government (10) - Non-legislative governmental agency (17) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (20) - Supranational union (3)

Key Question: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Other - None

Showing below up to 23 results in range #1 to #23.

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)