Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Climate: Continental (Köppen D-type)

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (8) - Ecosystems (7) - Governance (15) - Values and Norms (5) - Water Quality (13) - Water Quantity (12)

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (4) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (17) - conservation lands (6) - forest land (8) - industrial use (9) - mining operations (2) - rangeland (6) - religious/cultural sites (6) - urban (10) - urban- high density (9)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (14) - Domestic/Urban Supply (17) - Fisheries - farmed (3) - Fisheries - wild (4) - Hydropower Generation (9) - Industry - consumptive use (7) - Industry - non-consumptive use (4) - Livestock (3) - Mining/Extraction support (1) - Other Ecological Services (6) - Recreation or Tourism (7)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (13) - Cultural Interest (3) - Development/humanitarian interest (3) - Environmental interest (8) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (7) - Industry/Corporate Interest (7) - Local Government (10) - Non-legislative governmental agency (10) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (15) - Supranational union (2)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (2) - How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (2) - How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (1) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (2) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (5) - What approaches are most beneficial for rapidly growing cities in the developing world to link water management to sustainable urban growth strategy? (1) - What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (3) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (2) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (7) - Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (1)

Showing below up to 19 results in range #1 to #19.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)