Difference between revisions of "Form:Case Study"
From AquaPedia Case Study Database
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|} | |} | ||
=Economic, Regional, and Political Framework= | =Economic, Regional, and Political Framework= | ||
| − | {{{field|REP Framework|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols= | + | {{{field|REP Framework|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols=100|placeholder=Longstanding political, social, economic, and other factors play a significant role in shaping water issues for any region. Please discuss any background topics that are important for understanding how the issues of this case interact.|editor=wikieditor}}} |
=Key Questions= | =Key Questions= | ||
The greatest value of any case study is the ability to identify transferable knowledge, | The greatest value of any case study is the ability to identify transferable knowledge, | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
result adds to previous knowledge. | result adds to previous knowledge. | ||
| − | {{{field|Abstract|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols= | + | {{{field|Abstract|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols=100|editor=wikieditor}}} |
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
to anyone in any discipline. | to anyone in any discipline. | ||
| − | {{{field|Questions and Wisdom|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols= | + | {{{field|Questions and Wisdom|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols=100|editor=wikieditor}}} |
{{{end template}}} | {{{end template}}} | ||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
<headertabs/> | <headertabs/> | ||
| − | {{{for template|Case Description|embed in field=Case Study[Case Description] | + | {{{for template|Case Description|embed in field=Case Study[Case Description]}}} |
{| class="formtable" | {| class="formtable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
'''Description''' | '''Description''' | ||
| − | {{{field|Issue Description|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols= | + | {{{field|Issue Description|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols=100|placeholder=Provide more detail and insight to the issue and fully discuss the stakeholders and variables in relation to the case study. The Analysis section will allow you to discuss the |
relationships between these issues.|editor=wikieditor}}} | relationships between these issues.|editor=wikieditor}}} | ||
| Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
Analysis: | Analysis: | ||
| − | {{{field|Analysis|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols= | + | {{{field|Analysis|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols=100|editor=wikieditor|placeholder=One of the most powerful tools for representing functional relationships among large numbers of interconnected components is network analysis. A network (or graph) is a collection of nodes (vertices) and links (edges) between the nodes. What natural, societal, and political processes and variables were most important in this case? Can you “map” their relationships to each other? Network maps can be provided as scanned hand-made drawings or digitally produced images.}}} |
Synthesis: | Synthesis: | ||
| − | {{{field|Synthesis|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols= | + | {{{field|Synthesis|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols=100|editor=wikieditor|placeholder=Synthesize the information you have presented to draw conclusions and highlight important issues and lessons learned. Provide your insight on what knowledge/wisdom from this case can be transferred to other settings}}} |
{{{field|User|hidden|default=current user}}} | {{{field|User|hidden|default=current user}}} | ||
{{{end template}}} | {{{end template}}} | ||
| Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
'''Description''' | '''Description''' | ||
| − | {{{field|Key Question Description|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols= | + | {{{field|Key Question Description|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols=100|placeholder=Describe why the question applies to this case.|editor=wikieditor}}} |
{{{end template}}} | {{{end template}}} | ||
Revision as of 10:17, 2 June 2012
