Difference between revisions of "Form:ASI"

From AquaPedia Case Study Database
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
<div id="wikiPreview" style="display: none; padding-bottom: 25px; margin-bottom: 25px; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"></div>
 
<div id="wikiPreview" style="display: none; padding-bottom: 25px; margin-bottom: 25px; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"></div>
{{{for template|Case Reflection}}}
+
{{{for template|ASI}}}
 
While the historical, geographical and scientific facts involved in a water management problem or water conflict can often be attributed to well-respected sources and agreed upon by multiple parties, each problem can also have multiple facets and not all issues may be considered equally important by all parties. Certain perspectives may interpret the implications of neutral facts in a different way from others.
 
While the historical, geographical and scientific facts involved in a water management problem or water conflict can often be attributed to well-respected sources and agreed upon by multiple parties, each problem can also have multiple facets and not all issues may be considered equally important by all parties. Certain perspectives may interpret the implications of neutral facts in a different way from others.
  

Revision as of 17:55, 26 October 2012

This is the "ASI" form - use it to create essays relating to existing case studies. The reflections will be similar to the Analysis, Synthesis, and Insight section embedded in Case Studies, but remain separate and under the individual author's direct control.

To create a page with this form, enter the page name below; if a page with that name already exists, you will be sent to a form to edit that page.