Information for "ASI:Suggested Negotiation Approaches for Mitigating the Ongoing Blue Nile Conflict"


Jump to: navigation, search

Basic information

Display titleASI:Suggested Negotiation Approaches for Mitigating the Ongoing Blue Nile Conflict
Default sort keySuggested Negotiation Approaches for Mitigating the Ongoing Blue Nile Conflict
Page length (in bytes)4,204
Page ID1240
Page content languageEnglish (en)
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of views1,764
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes

Page protection

EditAllow all users
MoveAllow all users

Edit history

Page creatorThenry01 (Talk | contribs)
Date of page creation12:00, 13 May 2013
Latest editorThenry01 (Talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit12:05, 13 May 2013
Total number of edits4
Total number of distinct authors1
Recent number of edits (within past 91 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Magic word (1)
  • __NOEDITSECTION__
Transcluded template (1)

Template used on this page:

Facts about "Suggested Negotiation Approaches for Mitigating the Ongoing Blue Nile Conflict"RDF feed
ASIASI:Suggested Negotiation Approaches for Mitigating the Ongoing Blue Nile Conflict +
ASIContributor Tameisha Henry +
Article CreatorThenry01 +
Case StudyAddressing the Transboundary Water Conflict Between the Blue Nile Riparian States +
Last Edited13 May 2013 +
Last Edited UserThenry01 +
Reflection Text Summary The key to mitigating the negative effect The key to mitigating the negative effects of power asymmetry in water negotiations is to expand the proverbial pie by creating additional value and diversifying the menu of negotiating agenda items. This should include efforts to move away from viewing the Nile as a fixed resource towards the efficient and effective use, reuse, and repurposing of the Nile waters.reuse, and repurposing of the Nile waters. +