Difference between revisions of "ASI:Alternative Solutions to the Water Demand of Northern China"

Revision as of 13:26, 31 July 2013

This article is linked to Water Quality Control of the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) Middle Route Project (MRP)

The article “South-to-North Water Transfer Project: Is it Needed?” by Chansheng He et al. in 2012 points out the shifting trend of many countries such as the United States have nowadays changed their focus from the development of new large water transfer schemes to conservative use of the limited water supplies through reallocation and efficiency improvements. Due to the long existing fact of the water-demanded northern China plain, it suggest the government of China should “continue to actively implement and enforce its demand management programs nationwide to improve water conservation and to maximize net benefits of water uses through water transfers between rural and urban users.”^[1]

Ms. Ruth Mathews, the Executive Director of the Water Footprint Network, also comment with her opinion to the case. In the article “China's South-North water transfer is ‘irrational,’(2009)” she recognizes the political reason to result in high agriculture development in water scarce of northern China, and suggests to redistribution of land use by studying the water footprint of China, to understand how water is used within the country.^[2]

Supportive to the diversion project, Xia Jun, President of the International Water Resources Association and head of the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Water Resources Centre, points out several changes including unifying water management and bringing in overall planning for resource usage, energy development and the environment, creating a rational management system for river basins that is both unified and responsive to climate change, all of which , according to his words, should be considered along with the water diversion project.^[3]

Lacked with comprehensive environmental effect analysis, the whole SNWDP has been defined as “a principal means for reallocating China's unevenly distributed water resources, designed to solve water shortage problems in the northern metropolitan areas, where water demands exceed the capacity of local resources. Therefore, the goal of the projects is mainly to supply water to urban areas and industry. Farm irrigation and environmental improvement are secondary considerations.”^[4] To solve the water demand problem, many scholars still emphasize on long term demand management.

Implementation such as institutional approaches and water saving technology, water pricing, water market, conservation, and efficiency improvement are suggesting China to take a more active role to reduce its water footprint and to cooperate on the use of international rivers.^[5] Such approaches like Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) has been brought up by scholars, addressed to be the alternatives to further maintain China’s water sustainability.

1. ^ Chansheng He, Xiaoying He and Li Fu (2010). China's South-to-North Water Transfer Project: Is it Needed?, Geography Compass 4/9 (2010): 1312-1323
2. ^ Tom Levitt. China's South-North water transfer is “irrational.” chinadialogue.net 09-27-2012: http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/5128-China-s-South-North-water-transfer-is-irrational-
3. ^ Xu Nan, Zhang Chun. Water-transfer projects "essential" says Chinese scientist. Chinadialogue 08-28-2012: http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/5133-Water-transfer-projects-essential-says-Chinese-scientist
4. ^ Liu Changming. Environmental Issues and the South-North Water Transfer Scheme. The China Quarterly, No. 156, Special Issue: China's Environment (Dec., 1998), pp. 909
5. ^ Jianguo Liu, Wu Yang. Water Sustainability for China and Beyond. Science Magazine, Vol. 337, 10 August 2012