Information for "ASI:Agricultural Subsidies"


Jump to: navigation, search

Basic information

Display titleASI:Agricultural Subsidies
Default sort keyAgricultural Subsidies
Page length (in bytes)21,871
Page ID1076
Page content languageEnglish (en)
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of views7,195
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes

Page protection

EditAllow all users
MoveAllow all users

Edit history

Page creatorLkuhl01 (Talk | contribs)
Date of page creation03:41, 12 February 2013
Latest editorAmanda (Talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit11:51, 28 October 2013
Total number of edits10
Total number of distinct authors2
Recent number of edits (within past 91 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Magic word (1)
  • __NOEDITSECTION__
Transcluded template (1)

Template used on this page:

Retrieved from "http://aquapedia.waterdiplomacy.org/wiki/index.php/ASI:Agricultural_Subsidies"
Facts about "Agricultural Subsidies"RDF feed
ASIASI:Agricultural Subsidies +
ASIContributor L. Kuhl +
Article CreatorLkuhl01 +
Case StudyCompeting Demands Among Water Uses in the Apalachicola- Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin +
Last Edited28 October 2013 +
Last Edited UserAmanda +
Reflection Text Summary Agricultural production has received far … Agricultural production has received far less attention than other water uses in the ACF, and agricultural management has been largely overlooked as a source of potential means of addressing the basin’s water issues. This is surprising, given that agriculture is generally a relatively inefficient user of water and may offer significant “low-hanging fruit” for water savings. Since agriculture is a dominant user of water in the ACF and the primary use of water in the Flint River sub-basin (Georgia Department of Natural Resources 2006), attention should be paid to how agricultural policies and management can be used to improve water management in the basin. Can agricultural policies, mainly rethinking subsidies, encourage water savings in the Flint River Basin, thereby helping to address basin-wide conflict in the ACF?to address basin-wide conflict in the ACF? +