Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Water Use : Industry - non-consumptive use or Mining/Extraction support & Stakeholder Type: Federated state/territorial/provincial government

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (6) - Ecosystems (7) - Governance (6) - Values and Norms (5) - Water Quality (8) - Water Quantity (6)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (1) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (2) - Dry-summer (3) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (1) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (1) - Monsoon (2) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (2) - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (1) - temperate (1)

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (3) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (5) - conservation lands (2) - industrial use (5) - mining operations (2) - religious/cultural sites (1) - urban (4) - urban- high density (2)

Water Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Agriculture or Irrigation - Domestic/Urban Supply - Fisheries - farmed - Fisheries - wild - Hydropower Generation - Industry - consumptive use - Industry - non-consumptive use - Livestock - Mining/Extraction support - Other Ecological Services - Recreation or Tourism - Other - None

Stakeholder Type: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Community or organized citizens - Cultural Interest - Development/humanitarian interest - Environmental interest - Federated state/territorial/provincial government - Industry/Corporate Interest - Local Government - Non-legislative governmental agency - Sovereign state/national/federal government - Supranational union - Other - None

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (1) - How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (2) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (2) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (2)

Showing below up to 8 results in range #1 to #8.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)