Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Land Use: urban- high density & Stakeholder Type: Federated state/territorial/provincial government

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (2) - Ecosystems (4) - Governance (5) - Values and Norms (3) - Water Quality (4) - Water Quantity (4)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (1) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (3) - Dry-summer (2) - Dry-winter (1) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (2) - Monsoon (1)

Land Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- agricultural- confined livestock operations - agricultural- cropland and pasture - conservation lands - forest land - industrial use - mining operations - rangeland - religious/cultural sites - urban - urban- high density - Other - None

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (4) - Domestic/Urban Supply (5) - Fisheries - wild (1) - Hydropower Generation (4) - Industry - consumptive use (2) - Industry - non-consumptive use (2) - Livestock (1) - Other Ecological Services (2) - Recreation or Tourism (2)

Stakeholder Type: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Community or organized citizens - Cultural Interest - Development/humanitarian interest - Environmental interest - Federated state/territorial/provincial government - Industry/Corporate Interest - Local Government - Non-legislative governmental agency - Sovereign state/national/federal government - Supranational union - Other - None

Key Question:

- How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (1) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (1) - What approaches are most beneficial for rapidly growing cities in the developing world to link water management to sustainable urban growth strategy? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (2) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (1)

Showing below up to 5 results in range #1 to #5.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)