Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Climate: Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) & Stakeholder Type: Community or organized citizens

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (6) - Ecosystems (7) - Governance (13) - Values and Norms (6) - Water Quality (11) - Water Quantity (11)

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use:

- agricultural- cropland and pasture (12) - conservation lands (5) - forest land (5) - industrial use (5) - mining operations (1) - rangeland (7) - religious/cultural sites (5) - urban (6) - urban- high density (1)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (13) - Domestic/Urban Supply (11) - Fisheries - wild (2) - Hydropower Generation (6) - Industry - consumptive use (2) - Livestock (4) - Mining/Extraction support (1) - Other Ecological Services (1) - Recreation or Tourism (3)

Stakeholder Type: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Community or organized citizens - Cultural Interest - Development/humanitarian interest - Environmental interest - Federated state/territorial/provincial government - Industry/Corporate Interest - Local Government - Non-legislative governmental agency - Sovereign state/national/federal government - Supranational union - Other - None

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (3) - How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (1) - How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (1) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (2) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (3) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (5) - Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (1)

Showing below up to 14 results in range #1 to #14.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)