Browse by Attribute
Choose a category:
- ASI (43)
- Article (772)
- Case Study (75)
- Key Question (28)
Case Study > Stakeholder Type :
Community or organized citizens or
Development/humanitarian interest or
Federated state/territorial/provincial government
& Key Question :
To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? or
What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? or
What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution?
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (8)
- Continental (Köppen D-type) (6)
- Dry-summer (3)
- Dry-winter (4)
- Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (4)
- Moist (4)
- Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (5)
- Monsoon (5)
- Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (7)
- alpine (3)
- cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (1)
- temperate (1)
Showing below up to 21 results in range #1 to #21.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
C
- Case Study of Transboundary Dispute Resolution: Multilateral Working Group on Water Resources (Middle East)
- China: The Three Gorges Dam Hydroelectric Project
- Colorado River Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead
- Creative Options and Value Creation to Address Water Security in the Eastern Nile Basin
E
I
- Integrated Joint Management Agreements of Mekong River Basin Riparians
- Integrated Management and Negotiations for Equitable Allocation of Flow of the Jordan River Among Riparian States
- Integration of a Basin-Wide Framework for Protecting Danube Water Quality
- International Management for Water Quality Within The Kura-Araks Basin
M
- Management, Protection, and Control of Lake Titicaca
- Mineral and Petroleum Resource Extraction in the Arctic Ocean – Conflicting Oversight, Governance and Rights
N
O
P
T
U
Y