Browse by Attribute
Choose a category:
- ASI (43)
- Article (772)
- Case Study (75)
- Key Question (28)
Case Study > Stakeholder Type :
Development/humanitarian interest or
Supranational union
& Key Question :
How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? or
How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? or
What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? or
Other
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (7)
- Continental (Köppen D-type) (4)
- Dry-summer (6)
- Dry-winter (4)
- Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (5)
- Moist (2)
- Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (5)
- Monsoon (5)
- Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (5)
- alpine (1)
- cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (2)
- temperate (2)
- Agriculture or Irrigation (15)
- Domestic/Urban Supply (17)
- Fisheries - farmed (3)
- Fisheries - wild (5)
- Hydropower Generation (10)
- Industry - consumptive use (4)
- Industry - non-consumptive use (7)
- Livestock (5)
- Mining/Extraction support (3)
- Other Ecological Services (8)
- Recreation or Tourism (3)
Showing below up to 21 results in range #1 to #21.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
2
A
- A Salty Affair: An Analysis of U.S. – Mexico Water Diplomacy in the Colorado River
- Addressing the Transboundary Water Conflict Between the Blue Nile Riparian States
C
- Case Study of Transboundary Dispute Resolution: Multilateral Working Group on Water Resources (Middle East)
- China: The Three Gorges Dam Hydroelectric Project
- Creative Options and Value Creation to Address Water Security in the Eastern Nile Basin
D
F
G
I
- Integrated Joint Management Agreements of Mekong River Basin Riparians
- Integrated Management and Negotiations for Equitable Allocation of Flow of the Jordan River Among Riparian States
L
M
M cont.
- Management, Protection, and Control of Lake Titicaca
- Mineral and Petroleum Resource Extraction in the Arctic Ocean – Conflicting Oversight, Governance and Rights
R
T
U
W