Browse by Attribute
Choose a category:
- ASI (43)
- Article (772)
- Case Study (75)
- Key Question (28)
Case Study > Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:
Governance
& Land Use :
mining operations or
rangeland or
religious/cultural sites
& Stakeholder Type :
Local Government or
Non-legislative governmental agency
& Key Question :
How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? or
What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? or
What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? or
Other
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (7)
- Continental (Köppen D-type) (7)
- Dry-summer (6)
- Dry-winter (5)
- Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (2)
- Moist (4)
- Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (6)
- Monsoon (5)
- Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (9)
- alpine (2)
- cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (1)
- temperate (3)
- Agriculture or Irrigation (13)
- Domestic/Urban Supply (12)
- Fisheries - farmed (1)
- Fisheries - wild (4)
- Hydropower Generation (10)
- Industry - consumptive use (2)
- Industry - non-consumptive use (2)
- Mining/Extraction support (2)
- Other Ecological Services (6)
- Recreation or Tourism (4)
Showing below up to 17 results in range #1 to #17.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
C
- Case Study of Transboundary Dispute Resolution: Multilateral Working Group on Water Resources (Middle East)
- Case Study of Transboundary Dispute Resolution: the Tigris-Euphrates Basin
- Conflict Management Strategies Among Riparians Within the Indus River Basin
E
G
I
- Integrated Management and Negotiations for Equitable Allocation of Flow of the Jordan River Among Riparian States
- Integration of a Basin-Wide Framework for Protecting Danube Water Quality
M
- Management, Protection, and Control of Lake Titicaca
- Mineral and Petroleum Resource Extraction in the Arctic Ocean – Conflicting Oversight, Governance and Rights
N
O
P
T
U