Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Climate : Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) or cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) & Stakeholder Type: Federated state/territorial/provincial government

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (5) - Ecosystems (6) - Governance (9) - Values and Norms (7) - Water Quality (9) - Water Quantity (8)

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use:

- agricultural- cropland and pasture (9) - conservation lands (5) - forest land (2) - industrial use (4) - mining operations (2) - rangeland (3) - religious/cultural sites (4) - urban (3)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (9) - Domestic/Urban Supply (7) - Fisheries - wild (3) - Hydropower Generation (4) - Industry - consumptive use (1) - Livestock (4) - Mining/Extraction support (3) - Other Ecological Services (3) - Recreation or Tourism (3)

Stakeholder Type: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Community or organized citizens - Cultural Interest - Development/humanitarian interest - Environmental interest - Federated state/territorial/provincial government - Industry/Corporate Interest - Local Government - Non-legislative governmental agency - Sovereign state/national/federal government - Supranational union - Other - None

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (1) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (1) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (2) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (3) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (1) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (3)

Showing below up to 11 results in range #1 to #11.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)