Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Climate : Continental (Köppen D-type) or Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) & Stakeholder Type: Federated state/territorial/provincial government

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (6) - Ecosystems (9) - Governance (12) - Values and Norms (9) - Water Quality (12) - Water Quantity (11)

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (3) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (13) - conservation lands (5) - forest land (2) - industrial use (5) - mining operations (1) - rangeland (3) - religious/cultural sites (5) - urban (6) - urban- high density (3)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (12) - Domestic/Urban Supply (12) - Fisheries - wild (4) - Hydropower Generation (6) - Industry - consumptive use (3) - Industry - non-consumptive use (2) - Livestock (5) - Mining/Extraction support (2) - Other Ecological Services (5) - Recreation or Tourism (6)

Stakeholder Type: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Community or organized citizens - Cultural Interest - Development/humanitarian interest - Environmental interest - Federated state/territorial/provincial government - Industry/Corporate Interest - Local Government - Non-legislative governmental agency - Sovereign state/national/federal government - Supranational union - Other - None

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (2) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (2) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (2) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (3) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (3) - What approaches are most beneficial for rapidly growing cities in the developing world to link water management to sustainable urban growth strategy? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (2) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (2) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (4)

Showing below up to 15 results in range #1 to #15.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)